We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy of your information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to about the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
Case legislation is specific for the jurisdiction in which it was rendered. As an example, a ruling inside a California appellate court would not normally be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is usually a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; In the event the parents from the boy or Female never approve of these inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they could do if they could Slice off social relations with the son or perhaps the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these types of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Female who's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or guy who is a major, the pair is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who provides these types of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to process by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against these types of persons and further stern action is taken against these types of person(s) as provided by regulation.
Also, it may well review an appeal of a decision for which it's granted certification. In addition to its legal authority, the Court holds limited political authority. It will review and finalize a decision by The brand new Jersey Redistricting Commission on redistricting congressional districts In the event the Commission cannot achieve a decision.
13. The Supreme Court has held that once the act of misconduct is proven and also the employee is found guilty after owing process of law, it's the prerogative from the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, from the varied penalties provided in legislation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed isn't proportionate with the seriousness of the act of misconduct just isn't suitable however the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion inside of a structured and lawful method. Read more
These past decisions are called "case regulation", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Permit the decision stand"—could be the principle by which judges are bound to these types of past decisions, drawing on founded judicial authority to formulate their positions.
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the weight presented to any reported judgment may well rely on the reputation of both the reporter plus the judges.[seven]
The legislation as set up in previous court rulings; like common regulation, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming into the main case, it is also a nicely-proven proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is subject matter into the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.
The regulation of necessity identified and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it was the illegal action called regulation of necessity..
The police have the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a Court for cognizable offenses. The presence of this power casts an obligation over the police, and they must bear in mind, as held by this Court from time to time in its several pronouncemnts, that if a person is arrested to get a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not click here be violated. Primarily, the Police Officers are needed to protect instead of abduct. Read more
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability in the matter, but could not be answerable in almost any way for their actions. When the court delayed making this type of ruling, the defendants took their request on the appellate court.
If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the chance to review both the precedent plus the case under appeal, perhaps overruling the previous case regulation by setting a completely new precedent of higher authority. This could happen several times as the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first of your High Court of Justice, later with the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his enhancement from the concept of estoppel starting while in the High Trees case.
Summaries offer a condensed overview of offences and their penalties, plus the procedural facets of prosecuting and punishing individuals accused of committing crimes.